Soliz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STRINGER, Judge.
Adolfo Arturo Soliz seeks review of the trial court’s order revoking his probation. Soliz argues that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that he willfully and substantially violated conditions 10, 26, 35, and 36 of his probation. We agree that the court abused its discretion in finding a willful violation of conditions 10 and 26; however, we do not agree that the court abused its discretion in finding a willful violation of conditions 35 and 36. Because the trial court would have violated Soliz’s probation based on the violations of conditions 35 and 36 alone, we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Soto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Thorpe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Burse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Correa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Comolli v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Warner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- ANZAGEN BLACK v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023