Legal Opinion

Nizolek v. Nizolek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Warren County (Breen, J.), entered January 31, 2011, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4, to direct respondent to pay spousal support.

*935The parties are octogenarians married in 1947 with six adult children. Although they have lived separately since 1979, they have never divorced. Petitioner, who has no savings and qualifies for public assistance, twice previously petitioned for spousal support pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4 but was unsuccessful, presumably due to respondent’s similarly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Fuller v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Kenyon v. KenyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Lanese v. LaneseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Manzano v. ManzanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dachille v. DachilleNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Matter of Nieves v. IaconoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API