International Agricultural Corp. v. Spencer

The ruling in the case of Ball v. Powers, 62 Ga. 757, cited by the plaintiff in error, does not apply to this case. There it was held that “while negotiable paper drawn, delivered, and accepted on Sunday, is void between the parties, yet, if it is falsely dated as of another day, and comes to the hands of an innocent holder, who takes it for value, without notice and in the due course of trade, the acceptor is estopped in a suit against him *650by such holder.” In that case the consideration was legal, and the note was held void merely because it was signed on Sunday, while in the instant case…