Legal Opinion

United States v. James Lee Smertneck

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1992No. 91-4481PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLE, District Judge:

The crime to which the appellant entered a plea of guilty did not have a specific sentence provided in the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court sentenced according to a penalty plan applicable to a similar crime. Appellant asserts that the district court’s determination of a similar offense was in error as there is another offense more fitting to the appellant’s conduct and, if applied, would render a lesser penalty. We disagree and AFFIRM the sentence of the district court.

James Lee Smertneck was charged with a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(6).

It shall be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Juan Manuel Reyes-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HornsbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. David OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Dean Arthur AllardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Johnny Arnold Halliburton (95-5648) and Nancy Jane Welborn (95-5649)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. David OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API