Fox v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of driving while intoxicated. The court of appeals affirmed that conviction. Fox v. State, 900 S.W.2d 345 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth 1995). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review ostensibly to address the issue of whether, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, there exists a so-called “community caretaking function” exception to the requirement that a temporary detention be justified by reasonable suspicion. At the time we granted appellant’s petition we had already granted…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Fox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Rheinlander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
4Cited by28 opinions
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Walter, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Frank Bartow, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Bobbie Louetta Boyd v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011
- Bobbie Louetta Boyd v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.