Legal Opinion

Fox v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 25, 1996No. 0963-95PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of driving while intoxicated. The court of appeals affirmed that conviction. Fox v. State, 900 S.W.2d 345 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth 1995). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review ostensibly to address the issue of whether, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, there exists a so-called “community caretaking function” exception to the requirement that a temporary detention be justified by reasonable suspicion. At the time we granted appellant’s petition we had already granted…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Fox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Rheinlander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  2. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Walter, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Frank Bartow, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Bobbie Louetta Boyd v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011
  5. Bobbie Louetta Boyd v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API