Legal Opinion

Gerwig v. Bruere

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1989No. 2—88—0611PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Plaintiffs appeal the decision of the trial court striking certain testimony in evidence and denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to conform to the proof. The trial court held that the testimony in question was not relevant to the allegations in the complaint and the proposed amendments did not, as a matter of law, constitute a lack of reasonable care given the facts of this case. We affirm.

Defendant, Lakehurst Joint Venture (Lakehurst), is an Ohio limited partnership which owned, operated, managed and maintained the Lakehurst Mall in Waukegan, Illinois. Harriet Bruere, Inc., a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Decatur Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Olinger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hayes v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Greene v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Chapman v. FoggyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellig v. Delnor Community HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API