Legal Opinion
Vreeland v. Mayor of Jersey City
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On appeal from a decree of the chancellor, whose opinion is reported in Vreeland v. O’Neil, 9 Stew. Eq. 399.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scudder, J.
On bill filed by the complainant, Garret G. Vreeland, to foreclose a mortgage made by James O’Neil and wife to secure the payment of a bond for $1,600, dated February 10th, 1872, the mayor and aldermen of Jersey City were made defendants, because they claim a lien fojr certain water rents on the mortgaged premises as prior encumbrances to the complainant’s mortgage. An interlocutory decree having been made establishing the priority of these water rents over the complainant’s mortgage, this appeal has been taken to test its validity.
The water…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bea v. Turner Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Diorio v. Fair LawnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Munson Dye Works v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934