Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Felton v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided December 21, 1994No. 90-965Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSteinberg, Judge

I regret that I am unable to join in most of the well-written and scholarly opinion of the Court. I do concur in part II.B.2.b., regarding the inapplicability to the Court of subsection (b) of 28 U.S.C. § 2412. See Cook v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 226, 233-36 (1994), appeal docketed, No. 94-7073 (Fed.Cir.1994).

I. SUMMARY

However, for several reasons, I respectfully dissent with respect to the Equal Access to Justice (EAJA) application submitted under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). First and foremost, despite its emphatic protestations to the contrary and its attempt to evoke the appearance of a balanced…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  5. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API