Felton v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSteinberg, Judge
I regret that I am unable to join in most of the well-written and scholarly opinion of the Court. I do concur in part II.B.2.b., regarding the inapplicability to the Court of subsection (b) of 28 U.S.C. § 2412. See Cook v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 226, 233-36 (1994), appeal docketed, No. 94-7073 (Fed.Cir.1994).
I. SUMMARY
However, for several reasons, I respectfully dissent with respect to the Equal Access to Justice (EAJA) application submitted under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). First and foremost, despite its emphatic protestations to the contrary and its attempt to evoke the appearance of a balanced…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.