Public Advocate v. Philadelphia Gas Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLE, Justice.
The issue before this Court is whether the fixed annual $18,000,000 payment by the Philadelphia Gas Works (“PGW”) to the City of Philadelphia (“City”), as required by a 1972 City ordinance, is constitutional and can be included in the calculation of PGW’s rate increase for fiscal year 1991-92. For the reasons expressed below, we believe this payment is constitutional, and therefore, we reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court which remanded this matter to the Philadelphia Gas Commission (“Gas Commission”) to re-calculate PGW’s rate increase request for the 1991-92…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- School District v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sparacino v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Council of City of Philadelphia v. StreetCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re NixonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Powell v. Housing Authority of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Powell v. Middletown Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.