Legal Opinion

Clawans v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 11, 1936No. 6601PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

Appellant was convicted in the police court of the District of Columbia of a violation of an Act of Congress of July 1, 1902, as amended by an act approved July 1, 1932 (47 Stat. 550, c. 366, § 7, pars. 39, 47, and 48 (D.C.Code Supp. I, 1933, T. 20, §§ 1739, 1755, 1756), and sentenced to pay a fine of $300 or to confinement in jail for sixty days. Appellant, when arraigned, claimed the right to a jury trial in accordance with the provisions of article 3, § 2, cl. 3, of the Con*266stitution, providing that, “The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roosevelt Rollerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Blackburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  4. Hogan v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API