Legal Opinion
United States v. Haas
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 21, 1944No. Nos. 1225, 1215PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, District Judge.
Defendant, in each of above actions, has petitioned for permission to file a complaint in the nature of a bill of review. Permission is denied.
The actions were brought to cancel naturalization. After trial, in a consolidated action, judgments, based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law, cancelling naturalization were duly entered. United States v. Haas, D.C., 51 F.Supp. 910. Defendants did not appeal and the time for appeal has passed.
Both petitions are based upon the ground that, since the rendition and entry of the judgments, numerous decisions have been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Zegura v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. HaasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1943
- Gherwal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Peeke v. Citizens Banking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Sebastiano v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
- United States v. KunzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946