Legal Opinion

Wachtel v. Schelberg

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 9, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Byrnes, Ch. J.

Plaintiffs, tenants of the defendant, move for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Over a period of nine months these plaintiffs had paid rent to the defendant in amounts which turned out to be in excess of the maximum legal rent allowed by the Office of Price Administration. I say this turned out to be so because the proper rent was determined retroactively by that office after the expiration of the said nine months and when it was thus determined the office issued an order to the defendant directing a refund to plaintiffs of all sums collected by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Formel v. National City BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Di Bitetto v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API