Legal Opinion

Flagg v. Hedrick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 8, 1959No. 20415Published

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The undisputed evidence disclosing that the sale under the power contained in the security deed was held on the first Tuesday in January after proper advertisement, and that the mistakes in the dates of the deed which is sought to be reformed in the cross-action were the result of typographical errors overlooked by the parties, the court did not err in ordering reformation of the deed, as prayed in the cross-action, and in denying the prayers for cancellation. See Code §§ 37-205, 37-212, 37-215; W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Echols, 200 Ga. 284 (36 S. E. 2d 762);…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. EcholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Mulkey v. SpicerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API