Legal Opinion · Dissent

Palmer v. Thompson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 12, 1971No. 107Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice White,

with whom Mr. Justice Bren- • nan and Mr. Justice Marshall join, dissenting.

I agree with the majority that the central purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment is to protect Negroes from invidious discrimination. Consistent with this view, I had thought official policies forbidding or discouraging joint use of public facilities by Negroes and whites were at war with the Equal Protection Clause. Our cases make it unquestionably clear, as all of us agree, that a city or State may not énforce such a policy by maintaining officially separate facilities for the two races. It is also…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API