Legal Opinion

Wirries v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2007No. 05-35941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (“Reliance”) appeals from the district court’s judgment reversing the plan administrator’s decision to terminate Dama L. Wirries’s long term disability benefits under a group insurance policy (the “Policy”). We affirm.

I

Reliance contends that “[t]he change in the district court’s opinion regarding the reasonableness of the denial of benefits is inconsistent with the law of the case doctrine.” We review' a district court’s failure to apply the law of the case doctrine for abuse of discretion. Cont’l Ins. Co. v. Fed. Express Corp., 454 F.3d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Mary Anne Bendixen v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Federal Express Corporation, a Corporation, Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Federal Express Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Wirries v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wood v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API