Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1972No. 7219SC543Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Counsel for defendant candidly admits that he can find no error in the trial of this case. The record was submitted in order that we might review it for errors appearing on its face.

In each bill of indictment with regard to the first count, the check was copied in exact detail. With regard to the second count in each bill of indictment, the bill read as follows:

“And the Jurors Aforesaid, Upon Their Oath Aforesaid, Do Further Present, That the said John Henry Russell afterward, to wit, on the day and year aforesaid, at and in the County aforesaid, wittingly and unlawfully and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API