Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fusco v. Moses

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentCallahan, J.

I cannot see that there was such interference with the petitioners’ right to counsel as to warrant the relief afforded by restoration to their civil service status. Berninger’s visit to the attorney’s office was his individual act not performed at the instance or with the knowledge of the authority. The latter made no use of any information obtained at the attorney’s office. Guilt was abundantly established by evidence of conduct preceding the wrongful visit. Thus, the merits of the proceeding were in no way affected by the mistaken actions of Berninger.

The petitioners were offered the right…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fusco v. MosesNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rao v. GunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API