Legal Opinion

In Re Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1939No. 28314PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Stephens county directing J.G. Clift, assignee for the benefit of the creditors of C.A. Harris, to accord preference to a claim by the state for sales tax over the claim of general creditors in payment of the insolvent's debts out of the proceeds from the liquidation of the insolvent's assigned assets.

It is admitted that the tax became due before the assignment for the benefit of creditors was executed, but apparently the Tax Commission had taken no legal steps for collection of the tax until filing a motion in the insolvency…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. HerronSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. United States v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Matter of Atlas Television Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rush v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Huddleston v. VahlbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Barbee v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. DicksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API