Legal Opinion

Brigham Hopkins Co. v. Gross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1898No. 3089PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.—Hon.. Thomas Carroll, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

The question presented by the appeal herein is whether an action at law can be maintained against the survivors of a partnership, pending the settlement of the partnership estate, to recover a debt due from the firm. In Dyer v. Morse, 10 Wash. 492 (39 Pac. 138), construing in part the act of 1862, the effect of the holding was that such an action might be maintained, and that said act was in aid of the common law method of closing *219up such estates and not exclusive thereof. One reason advanced was that there was no method pointed out by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dyer v. MorseWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dow v. SimpsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Poppleton v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Brigham-Hopkins Co. v. GrossWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Brigham-Hopkins Co. v. GrossU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1901
  5. Ickes v. GazzamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API