Legal Opinion
Jaynes v. McConnell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 15, 2015No. 1 CA-CV 13-0651PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge:
¶ 1 Sara Jaynes appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for new trial against Dr. Elizabeth McConnell and her employer (collectively “McConnell”). For the following reasons, we vacate the trial court’s denial of Jaynes’s motion and remand for a new trial.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In April 2007, Jaynes was referred to colorectal surgeon Dr. Marc Goldblatt after a routine gynecological examination revealed a lesion on her rectovaginal wall. After examining the lesion, Goldblatt explained that the lesion was possibly a cyst and that removal was an option for treatment. Jaynes…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- O. Hommel Company v. Ferro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Auto Services Co., Inc. v. KPMG, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Douglas F. Warner v. Donat Rossignol v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- David Oaks v. Timothy R. Chamberlain, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- KAUFMAN v. GUEVARACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- Matthews v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Rep Custom v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Samuel Paz v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.