Langsdale v. Nicklaus

This was an action by the appellee against the appellants to recover the purchase-money for *290certain real estate in the city of Indianapolis, and to enforce a vendor’s lien. Finding and judgment for the plaintiff.

The defendants below, who appeal to this court, were required to answer under oath certain interrogatories, of which •they complain; but as the answers do not appear to have been given in evidence, we do not see that they could have been injured thereby.

The only other question in the cause grows out of the following facts:

1st. On the 25th of September, 1868,■ the plaintiff sold and…