Legal Opinion

Binion ex rel. Binion v. Chater

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 20, 1996No. 93 C 7636Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NORDBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 416(h), of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”). The Commissioner found that Clifton Binion was not entitled to Child’s Insurance Benefits (“CIB”) on the account of Johnny Binion because he was not the “child” of Johnny Binion (the wage earner) as that term is defined in the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 402(d), 416(h).

Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant filed a cross Motion for Summary Judgment, both of which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Herron v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Josefa DELGADO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. In Re Estate of RagenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Vito A. Lonzollo v. Caspar W. Weinberger, in His Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API