Long v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, WOMACK, JOHNSON, and HERVEY, JJ., joined.
We reversed this case and remanded it to the Court of Appeals for it to conduct a harm analysis. 1 In response, in a two-page opinion, the Court held that the error was non-constitutional and harmful. 2 Since the error was a Fourth Amendment violation (constitutional error), and since the harm analysis is inadequate, we remand the case to the Court for further analysis.
Since the error was constitutional, the Court of Appeals should have used the harm standard set forth in Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 44.2(a).…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- McCarthy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Long v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2005
4Cited by19 opinions
- Simpson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Long v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
- Alfredo Ayala v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016
- Baron Dewyon Bostice v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
- Baron Dewyon Bostice v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.