People v. Roeder
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
Appellant was found guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree by the court sitting without a jury, whereupon he made a motion for a new trial which was denied. The proceedings were then suspended and appellant was granted probation on condition that he serve one year in the county jail and pay a fine of $100. lie prosecutes this appeal from said order denying his motion for new trial, relying upon the following grounds for a reversal thereof: (1) that the verdict is contrary to the evidence; (2) that the evidence, as a matter of law, is insufficient to sustain the verdict; (3) that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. LatonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. NagyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ProchnauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. MacIasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. CollettaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. McGinnisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.