Legal Opinion

People v. Roeder

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1940No. Crim. 3389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

Appellant was found guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree by the court sitting without a jury, whereupon he made a motion for a new trial which was denied. The proceedings were then suspended and appellant was granted probation on condition that he serve one year in the county jail and pay a fine of $100. lie prosecutes this appeal from said order denying his motion for new trial, relying upon the following grounds for a reversal thereof: (1) that the verdict is contrary to the evidence; (2) that the evidence, as a matter of law, is insufficient to sustain the verdict; (3) that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. LatonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. People v. NagyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ProchnauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. MacIasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. CollettaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. McGinnisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API