Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Estate of McLeod

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1986No. 52081-0Published

1DissentDore, J.

(dissenting) — The majority holds that because the decedent's promise to make a will was supported by adequate consideration the testamentary transfer is not subject to inheritance tax. In so holding, the majority misconstrues both our case law on the subject and the applicable statutes. Therefore, I dissent.

Although there is some division of authority among the states as to whether a transfer by will, executed pursuant to a contract to make a will, is subject to inheritance tax, this question has been settled for more than 50 years in Washington. RCW 83.08.0104 imposes an inheritance tax on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Appraisal for Taxation, Under the Act in Relation to Taxable Transfers of Property, of the Estate of GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Carter v. CraigSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Clarke v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. In Re Krueger's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State v. MollierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API