Ernst & Young, LLP v. Clark
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice VENTERS.
This appeal arises out of the insolvency of AIK Comp, a workers’ compensation self-insurance group, and the efforts of the Rehabilitator appointed pursuant to Kentucky’s “Insurers Rehabilitation and Liquidation Law” 1 (IRLL) to assert tort claims on behalf of AIK Comp against Appellants, Ernst & Young LLP, and others. Similar claims against Appellants were also asserted by the individual members of AIK Comp 2 in a class action. The Franklin Circuit Court entered orders in each case denying Ernst & Young’s motion to enforce contractual provisions calling…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Humana Inc. v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hathaway v. EckerleKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- MHC Kenworth-Knoxville/Nashville v. M & H Trucking, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Stanton Health Facilities, LP v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
- Beam Partners, LLC v. Nancy G. Atkins, Liquidator of Ky. Health Coop., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Guangzhou Consortium Display Product Co. v. PNC Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.