Legal Opinion

Ernst & Young, LLP v. Clark

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2010No. 2007-SC-000770-TG, 2007-SC-000936-TGPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice VENTERS.

This appeal arises out of the insolvency of AIK Comp, a workers’ compensation self-insurance group, and the efforts of the Rehabilitator appointed pursuant to Kentucky’s “Insurers Rehabilitation and Liquidation Law” 1 (IRLL) to assert tort claims on behalf of AIK Comp against Appellants, Ernst & Young LLP, and others. Similar claims against Appellants were also asserted by the individual members of AIK Comp 2 in a class action. The Franklin Circuit Court entered orders in each case denying Ernst & Young’s motion to enforce contractual provisions calling…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Humana Inc. v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. EckerleKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. MHC Kenworth-Knoxville/Nashville v. M & H Trucking, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Stanton Health Facilities, LP v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
  4. Beam Partners, LLC v. Nancy G. Atkins, Liquidator of Ky. Health Coop., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2018
  5. Guangzhou Consortium Display Product Co. v. PNC Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API