Legal Opinion

Summerville v. Lipsig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 2000PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered March 15, 1999, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss this action for legal malpractice on the ground that it does not state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, an innocent bystander to a bank robbery, was shot by an off-duty police officer, in violation of established police guidelines governing the use of deadly force (Summerville v City of New York, 257 AD2d 566, lv denied 94 NY2d 755). He retained defendant law firm, which filed a suit on his behalf against the City but not against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharapata v. Town of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Home Insurance v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Cappetta v. LippmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Summerville v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Tri-G, Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Expansion Pointe Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API