Legal Opinion
Anderson v. The Edam
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 27, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Benedict, D. J.
These two actions are brought—one by the master and owners of the steam-ship Persian Monarch, and the other by the master and owners of the steamrship Napier—to recover salvage compensation for services rendered to the Dutch steamer Edam. They were tried together by consent. The following are the facts:
The steamer Edam, laden with a cargo and passengers, left Rotterdam, bound for New York, on the first day of January, 1882. On the fourteenth of January, in latitude 43 deg. N- and longitude 58 deg. 30 min. W., she lost all the blades of her propellor. Bails were then set, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Dillon v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Oliver v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Draper v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Sage v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co. v. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
- Rickard v. PringleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Canadian-Australian S. S. Line v. The StrathnevisDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1896
- Cape Fear Towing & Transportation Co. v. PearsallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
- Sobonis v. Steam Tanker National DefenderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.