Legal Opinion

Parano v. O'CONNOR

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1994No. 2032PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge:

Frank J. Parano, plaintiff in the trial court, appeals from the order sustaining preliminary objections, in the nature of a demurrer, filed by the defendants in the trial court. On appeal, Parano challenges the trial court’s dismissal of all four counts in his complaint, and argues that the trial court erred in not allowing him to amend his pleadings. 1 Upon review, we affirm. 2

This action arose after statements regarding appellant, Frank Parano, were allegedly made by James F. O’Connor (“O’Connor”), a vice president of 21st Century Health Corporation-USA, Inc. (“21…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas Merton Center v. Rockwell International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Gordon v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Curran v. Children's Service Center of Wyoming County, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Cloverleaf Development, Inc. v. Horizon Financial F.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Neish v. Beaver Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lloyd Z. Remick, Esq. v. Angel Manfredy John Manfredy Jeffrey H. Brown, Esq. Kathleen H. Klaus, Esq. D'AnconA & PflaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Maier v. MarettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Hunger v. Grand Central SanitationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Mzamane v. WinfreyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Smith v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API