Sefranka v. Sefranka

Motion by defendant “ for an order directing that the proposed questions as framed by defendant, pertaining to the issues arising upon the defendant’s counterclaim for annulment be tried by a jury.” Plaintiff’s action is for a separation.

Plaintiff opposes this motion on various grounds. Her first objection is that this is an action for a separation, not for an *540annulment, and that defendant by interposing his action as a counterclaim instead of bringing a separate action for annulment, is bound by the procedure pertaining to separation actions. There is no merit to this contention. A…