Treacy v. Vigersky

Ackekson, S. C. C.

This action is upon a promissory note alleged to have been made by the defendant to the order *411of the Jewett Eealty Corporation, of which company the plaintiff is receiver.

The matter now comes before me upon a motion to strike the answer, consisting principally of four separate defenses, upon the grounds that the third separate defense is frivolous, and that the balance of the answer and defenses are sham. As to the latter ground, it is sufficient to say that the defendant’s affidavit raises questions of fact which save the answer from being stricken out as sham.

"With respect…