Legal Opinion
Koczen v. VMR Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant VMR Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a compliance conference order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R.E. Rivera, J.), dated February 28, 2002, as permitted discovery to continue after the filing date of the note of issue.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The compliance conference order at issue is not appealable as of right because it does not decide a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Cohalan v Johnson Elec. Constr. Corp., 105 AD2d 770; see also…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Everitt v. Health Maintenance CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Cohalan v. Johnson Electrical Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Yetman v. St. Charles HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Benfeld v. Fleming Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Trbovich v. TrbovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Tangalin v. MTA Long Island BusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Barry v. BarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mega Constructon Corp. v. Benson Park AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.