Legal Opinion

Holber v. M & T Bank (In Re Scheffler)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 2012No. 22-11468PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD E. FEHLING, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

With all due respect for the excellent lawyers involved in this litigation, I suggest that they missed the real issues central to this dispute. They were correct to argue that the issue of reasonably equivalent value is important in this fraudulent transfer case. But the timing of the relevant events belies the parties’ narrow focus on the value of a certain technology as the key to resolving the Trustee’s claim.

II. SUMMARY OF DECISION

Debtor voluntarily assumed certain debt of his family’s business, Defendant Penn Graphics…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. In Re AughenbaughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of R.M.L., Inc. (In re R.M.L. Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. David Cutler Industries, Ltd. v. Bank of America (In re David Cutler Industries, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API