Legal Opinion

Griffith v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 28, 1965No. Civ. A. 380-64PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

This is a civil action for refund of income taxes and interest paid by the plaintiffs, husband and wife, for the years 1953 through 1960, plus interest thereon in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2411(a). This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340 and 1346(a) (1) and 26 U.S.C. § 7422.

The parties have stipulated the facts and I find, in accordance therewith, as follows:

Plaintiffs filed timely joint income tax returns for the calendar years 1953 through 1960, setting forth in each return the sum of $12,000.00 as alimony payments to Mr. Griffith’s former wife,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Seligmann v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  3. Katharine T. Hyde v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Cohen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. TylerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claus A. Cosman and Dorothy Cosman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  2. Kelly v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. State v. DeanerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API