Ford & Pruett v. Thomason
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Appeal; from Gwinnett superior court — Judge R. T. Daniel presiding. April 30, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.
1. The action was brought to recover commissions alleged to be 'due upon a sale of real estate. The contract providing for the commissions is in writing, and is of doubtful construction. It appears that the plaintiffs were authorized by the defendant to sell the real estate during a period named in the contract, and that during this period the defendant himself disposed of the property. Dnder the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), § 3587, he had a right to do this, unless the contract otherwise provided. It is contended in behalf of the plaintiffs that under the terms of the contract they…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Murray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Jalonick v. Greene County Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by13 opinions
- Horsley v. WoodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Johnson v. Lipscomb-Weyman-Chapman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Roberts v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Singleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Hillis v. Comer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.