Legal Opinion
Herise v. Tatum, Gomez, Smith & Vitale Construction, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 14, 1987No. 86-1684Published
1Per curiam
Affirmed. Ford Motor Company v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); United Technologies Communications Company v. Industrial Risk Insurers, 501 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company v. Hampton Shops, Inc., 332 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Wallace v. Rashkow, 270 So.2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Section 59.041 Florida Statutes (1985).
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. KikisSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Wallace v. RashkowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- United Technologies Communications Co. v. Indus. Risk InsurersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Consolidated Mutual v. Hampton ShopsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976