Legal Opinion

Clar v. Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1959No. 59-542PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

116 So.2d 34 (1959)

Henry CLAR, as Administrator of the Estate of Lolita M. Pullen, also known as Lolita Wright, deceased, Plaintiff,

v.

DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Defendant.

No. 59-542.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

October 15, 1959.

George B. Pomeroy and John Carruthers, II, Miami, for plaintiff.

Morehead, Forrest, Gotthardt & Greenberg, Miami, for defendant.

HORTON, Chief Judge.

A suit for damages was filed by the administrator of the decedent's estate, claiming that by reason of the negligence of the defendant's employee in failing to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schwob Co. v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Ake v. BirnbaumSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  3. Bloodworth v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. State Road Department v. BenderSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Davies v. DaviesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Oliver Davis and Lillie Mae DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Marks v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Jaworski v. City of Opa-LockaSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  4. McNulty v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Coleman Powermate, Inc. v. Rheem Mfg. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API