Legal Opinion

City of Winchester v. Winchester Water Works Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 5, 1920No. 51PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL PROM'THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

The Winchester Water Works Company filed its bill in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky seeking to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance establishing maximum rates for water to be furnished the city for public use and to the people thereof for private use. By the bill and amended bill it was charged that the city had no authority to pass or enforce an ordinance fixing such rates, because (1) no power had been granted to the city so to do by the legislature of Kentucky; (2) because the rates established were so low as to be confiscatory in their character,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Owensboro v. Owensboro Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. City of Jacksonville v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1909

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moore v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. City of Shreveport v. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. City of University Place v. Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Vernon Township v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. City of Seymour v. Texas Electric Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API