Legal Opinion
(PC) Jones v. Arnette
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 31, 2022No. 1:16-cv-01212Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 13 vs. (ECF No. 118.) 14 ARNETTE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 22 with this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983
and the Americans with Disabilities Act 23 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s ADA claims against 24 defendants Vasquez, Keener, Gonzalez, Flores,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador Laurel, Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador LaurelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Puett v. BlandfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. New Images Of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Shakit v. M/V Forum TraderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993