Legal Opinion

State v. . Sinodis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The evidence appearing on the record is not sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the issue of perjury. S. v. Hawkins, 115 N. C., 712, 20 S. E., 623. It is true, the testimony of Sam Yail may inferentially be in conflict with that of the defendant, but he does not say the defendant testified falsely before the justice of the peace. This is not enough on an indictment for perjury. S. v. Gates, 107 N. C., 832, 12 S. E., 319; S. v. Peters, 107 N. C., 876, 12 S. E., 74; 21 R. C. L., 259.

After losing his case before the justice of the peace and without appealing, Yail testifies: “I indicted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . PetersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . GatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. SailorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API