Legal Opinion

Webster v. Peet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Gratiot. (Daboll, J.) Bill to restrain the commission of waste. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

One Kosciusko P. Peet was indebted to various persons arid firms to an amount aggregating $3,150.41. He was the owner of a farm of 320 acres, 100 of which was cleared, and the balance woodland, the farm being subject at the time to two mortgages, amounting to-*327about 13,800. To secure tbe creditors first mentioned, he gave to complainants, as trustees for the creditors, a deed of the lands above referred to, subject to the mortgages then upon the land. The deed was in the usual form, with a recitation added that the conveyance was for the benefit of the creditors named, and with the following…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Bigelow v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API