Legal Opinion

Estate of Switzer v. Street

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 13, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Recall Mandate.

2Per curiam

Motion to recall the mandate in this case for purpose of further consideration as on rehearing was-made at the June, 1933, term and by special order of this Court such motion was continued over for further consideration and determination during this term, jurisdiction being expressly reserved for that purpose by special order of this Court entered during the last term.

This Court has now fully reconsidered every proposition presented as grounds for recall of the mandate and for rehearing. On October 13, 1933, we affirmed the decree below in lieu of granting a motion…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Holman v. Chevaillier's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  2. County Commissioners v. State ex rel. PattonSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
  3. Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Bade v. HibberdOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Beebe v. MorrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. ClementsSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Cook v. Walgreen Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Crosthwait v. the Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API