Legal Opinion

In Re Lane's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1937No. Docket No. 67, Calendar No. 39,253PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBttshnbll, J.

The record in this appeal by Cora Lane, special administratrix with general powers of the estate of Edward J. Lane, deceased, as claimant against the estate of Jane Lane, deceased, from the entry of a judgment non obstante veredicto, contains a “stipulation and statement of agreed facts ’ ’ which we quote:

“That Cora Lane, the widow of Edward Lane, deceased, and special administratrix of his estate, has filed a claim against the estate of Jane Lane, deceased, the claim being for an amount allegedly held by the said Jane Lane, during her lifetime for Edward Lane, and to be returned to him, when…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McInerney v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Wild v. WildMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. County of Marquette v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Hope v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Crissman v. CrissmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rivera de Vincenty v. Socorro LacotSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1981
  2. Boyer v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Harmon v. HarmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re Bizanes EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Martin v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API