Glass Co. v. Ludlum
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Lea/oenworth District Gowrt. In 1865 and 1866, William H. Hays and Jobn B. Ludlum, partners as Hays & Ludlum, were trading as merchants at the city of Leavenworth. They were indebted to the Boston and Somdwich Glass Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Massachusetts, in the sum of $1,153.24 for goods sold.
Read the full summary
Error from, Lea/oenworth District Gowrt. In 1865 and 1866, William H. Hays and Jobn B. Ludlum, partners as Hays & Ludlum, were trading as merchants at the city of Leavenworth. They were indebted to the Boston and Somdwich Glass Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Massachusetts, in the sum of $1,153.24 for goods sold. William H. Hays died March 26, 1866, and in July thereafter Ba/rrmel 8. JGudfom, was duly appointed and qualified as administrator of his estate, giving a bond, as such administrator, with WilUam Dtmlap and D. JR. Anthony as sureties. The petition avers that “ All…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kingman, C. J.:
l. Practice, escepUons. A question of practice is raised which must first be settled. A case made, or a bill of exceptions, should speak the truth as to the particular matter intended to be preserved thereby; and if there are any facts not presented by the party aggrieved, the adverse party has a right to insist that such facts shall be inserted in the case made, or bill of exceptions, before it is signed. In this case the de fend ants in error had a right to demand that their several exceptions made on the trial should be made a part of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Royer v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- State v. GallegosSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- Gaynes v. WallingfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Carr v. CatlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Stettauer Bros. v. Carney & StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.