Legal Opinion
Tittman v. Rappaport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 29, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Dianne S. Vogt appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated May 31, 2000, which denied her motion for leave to amend her answer, and (2) an order of the same court, dated February 1, 2001, which denied her motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, but which was, in effect, for leave to reargue the prior motion.
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 1, 2001, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue; and it is further,
Ordered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sidor v. ZuhoskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Henderson v. GulatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Muro v. Bay Ready Mix & Supplies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Privitera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Keenan v. BruceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- RCN Construction Corp. v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ali v. Tip Top Tows, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Boyer v. PacificoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004