Legal Opinion

State of Missouri ex rel. Baltimore & O. Telegraph Co. v. Bell Telephone Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided March 31, 1885PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Application for a Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Brewer, J., (orally.)

In this case, I regret to say that my brother Treat and myself do not agree fully as to the rights of the parties. It is an application on the part of the Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Company to compel the Bell Telephone Company of Missouri—the company having the telephone business of this city—to permit telephonic communication between it and the petitioner, the Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Company. The defendant answers that it is engaged in the telephonic business here by virtue of a license obtained from the American Bell Telephone Company, a Massachusetts corporation;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  3. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  4. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
  5. City of Jefferson City, Mo. v. Cingular WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API