Legal Opinion

Crooks v. Maynard

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1987No. 15983PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

This case arises out of a dispute between an administrative district judge and a district court clerk. The district court clerk, Petitioner Crooks, initiated an original proceeding in the Supreme Court requesting an Alternative Writ of Prohibition be issued against Judge Maynard, the administrative district judge. The ease was submitted to a Panel of Masters for the purpose of receiving evidence, making Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and entering a recommendation to the Court. The Masters recommended that a Writ of Prohibition should not be issued. We agree and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Rust v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Rutledge v. WorkmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Hansen v. ParsonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. WharfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Harvey v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Petuskey v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Henry v. YsursaIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Wasden v. IDAHO STATE BD. OF LAND COM'RSIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Estep v. COM'R OF BOUNDARY COUNTYIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API