Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Wahinenui

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1904Published

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

*261OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

This Avas an action of ejectment in which the plaintiff was nonsuited on the ground that “the evidence of the plaintiff disclosed that since the commencement of the action the plaintiff had parted Avith his title to the land in dispute by deed to one L. L. McCandless.” The propriety of the nonsuit is the only •question presented by the bill of exceptions. Cases are cited in the plaintiff’s brief from the California, Kentucky, Ohio, Alabama, Vermont, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan and North Carolina courts. Two Federal cases are also cited, one •of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Hardy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Mossman v. Hawaiian GovernmentHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Northern Pac. R. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  5. Edgerton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API