Legal Opinion

Smith v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 1, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.

These consolidated cases resulted from a collision between the automobile of Charles Murphy, driven by his wife Paye H. Murphy, and a truck owned and operated by James H. Smith.

Murphy sued Smith for damages to his car and medical expenses incurred in the treatment of his wife. Faye H. Murphy sued Smith for personal injuries and Smith sued Murphy and wife for personal injuries and for damage to his truck. The cases were all consolidated for trial. Smith, as plaintiff, first introduced his proof and rested. Murphy and wife then moved for a directed verdict. Their motion was sustained. Murphy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tri-State Transit Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. Shew v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  3. Perry v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Halfacre v. HartTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ledford v. FisherTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1963
  3. Hobbs v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API