Legal Opinion

People v. Ward

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1999No. Docket 112395PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we consider whether defendant, who was represented by retained counsel, should be permitted to set aside a defective OUIL 2d plea fourteen months after it was entered where (1) defendant’s subsequent ouil arrest and desire to avoid sentencing as an ouil 3d offender obviously motivated the motion, and (2) retained counsel, in the absence of the prosecutor, knowingly entered a woefully defective plea at arraignment without bringing the defects to the court’s attention. Thus, retained counsel preserved the strategic possibility of setting aside the plea if defendant were ever…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peguero v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. People v. WinegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. IngramMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. ErwinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Al-SharaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. DavidovichMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. ClementMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People v. OsaghaeMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API